Home
University
Processes
Structure
Strategic plan
Implementation
Important documents
University targets
Search
Menu
Menu
Contacts
Processes
Projects
Risks
Coordination of information management
Crisis management
Data protection and information security management
Financial Management
Human Resources Management
Infrastructure coordination and management
Management and handling of matters of ethics
Management and representation
Management of changes and areas for improvement
Management of international cooperation
Policy making
Quality management
Risk management
Strategic management
RAK 25
Improvement and quality of management model (Planning / Implementation)
RAK 32
Agreeing strategic directions and principles of internationalization
RAK 26
ALPHA project (introducing a user-centric approach to support activities provided by the academic and administrative and support units)
RAK 29
Analysis of the organization management model: greater involvement of academic staff in management (Completed)
RAK 71
CO2 emission model and its application
RAK 70
Coherent organisation
RAK 67
Collection of mobility data
RAK 45
Development and implementation of new financial regulations (completed)
RAK 31
Efficient and sustainable management of TalTech infrastructures (Awaiting decision)
RAK 30
Development of data processing principles and policies
RAK 27
Development of the data warehouse and monitoring reports
RAK 86
Establishment of the TalTech Endowment Fund
RAK 24
Harmonizing monitoring and ensuring real-time traceability
RAK 33
Improving the position in international rankings
RAK 82
Increasing Research capacity in Circular Economy
RAK 85
Development of Strategic Capabilities and Mitigating Strategic Risks
RAK 23
Implementation of the concept of a sustainable and climate-neutral university
RAK 89
The program for strengthening strategic development directions
Risk 1
Long-term, consistent underestimation of the quality and risks of the management in administering competitive funding of contracts/projects will put the competitiveness and reputation of the university as a whole at great risk.
Risk 2
Non-transparency of internal university funding models and rules will devalue the quality of trust management.
Risk 3
Inadequate readiness of the university to prevent or mitigate risks arising from the changes in government policies, laws, and funding measures will endanger the financial viability and competitiveness of the university.
Regulations
Scroll to top
